Print this page

Is TANF Functioning Well as Part of the Safety Net?

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), the program that replaced traditional “welfare” (Aid to Families with Dependant Children, AFDC) in 1996, is due for reauthorization by the end of 2010. Under the program, states, territories and tribes receive fixed block grant funds for services, benefits and administrative costs to cover the goals of the TANF program to support and promote families. States have wide discretion over the use of these funds, which include income, child care and transportation assistance, job training, education and other services.


After almost 15 years of implementation and one reauthorization in the 2005 Deficit Reduction Act, TANF remains a flawed part of the nation’s safety net for low-income families with children. A key issue with the TANF program is the low participation rate. In 1997, 55 percent of poor children received TANF cash assistance, yet in 2007, only 24 percent received assistance. This drop is caused by a variety of factors: TANF’s loss of entitlement status as a government assistance program; an emphasis on reducing TANF caseloads; deflection or discouragement from the application process; difficult work requirements for families to complete in order to receive funds; and a 60-month limit to receive benefits, among others.


Another critical issue is the emphasis on welfare-to-work, a strategy designed to promote employment for TANF recipients. Although an encouraging sound bite, the welfare-to-work emphasis pushes many families into low-wage, part-time positions with little room for upward mobility. Additionally, it is difficult for families with barriers to employment (e.g., disability, domestic violence, limited education or poor access to child care) to comply with TANF requirements to receive funds. Job seekers found it especially challenging to meet the work requirement